let the eagle soar

As an Eagle Scout and a Christian, I have to say that I think it's ridiculous that an Eagle Scout in Seattle is being forced to declare a belief in a supreme being or leave the Boy Scouts.

One has to wonder what the Boy Scouts think such a membership requirement will accomplish.

I mean, they could require adherence to a particular faith. This would seem to ensure that all Boy Scouts are that much more "morally straight", at least if you come from the perspective of that faith.

Of course, in this pluralistic age, such rigid definitions would not be popular, and would certainly decimate the population of the Boy Scouts, even if a particularly large faith like Catholicism were chosen.

But even more importantly, it's impossible to really determine adherence to a particular faith. You can check church attendance, but I know from experience that not everyone inside a church believes what's being preached.

And so the Boy Scouts find themselves merely asking people to declare a belief in something ? anything! "Mother Nature would be fine," says a Boy Scouts official.

But it's plain that watering down this requirement to such a level makes it absolutely pointless. If merely saying, "okay, fine, I believe in Mother Nature or whatever; now can I have the rank of Eagle Scout?" suffices, then why not simply get rid of the requirement completely? It obviously isn't changing the speaker's mind in any way, much less affecting his behavior.

The fact that the boy in the article was only given a week to make a choice that takes some people lifetimes only renders it even more laughable.

For most people I know (who are not religious), this only serves to point out how ridiculous some of the Boy Scouts' stances are. However, most of them would likely agree that overall it is a fine organization, and they might overlook such problems, should they or someone they know want to be a member.

Ironically, I and those who practice my particular take on Christianity agree that this tenet of the Boy Scouts is undesirable, but we disagree that it should be overlooked. It's hard to champion an organization that all but explicitly states "all religions are the same and of equal value" when one believes such a statement to be false.

For most people, I would expect this to be a minor point, but so it goes with me. And yes, I don't expect that most people who read Cock-a-hoop will know where I'm coming from on this one.

1 comment so far

1 Nov 03 '02 11:10pm:

doug replied:

"Amen!

Oops, um, I mean, as an Eagle Scout, I'm disappointed by this turn of events.

The real problem is that there isn't an alternative organization to the Boy Scouts that's not encumbered with the same narrow-minded definitions of what's acceptable. And you're either stuck with saying "Well, it's problematic, but it's still better than NOT being in the Boy Scouts", or "I'm going to dissociate myself and my child from any organization like this on principle, despite the positive benefits they might reap from the experience". A binary, non-nuanced set of choices.

Sort of like voting, huh?"


Comment on this entry

(required)
(required, won't be displayed)

Save the above information for future comments
(must be correct to submit — prevents spam)

You must log in to comment with that data.

Allowed HTML: <a href="[URL]"> <b> <i> <s> <em> <li> <ol> <ul> <strong> <blockquote>

Previous entry: "Untitled #454" Next entry: "Untitled #455"

Old blog entries by month

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000