Things I hate about the Web: information glut

If all goes according to plan (and what reason do I have for assuming it will this time?), this will be the inaugural post in a series on "things I hate about the Web". I'm sure it'll be a hit with both of you out there, given that you've already shown your slavish devotion to the Web by accessing this diatribe via it. Sellout.


Anyhow, today's e-angry-old-man-yelling-out-loud-on-a-park-bench is about information. There's too dang much of it on the Web. And it annoys me. Let me tell you kids about it.

See, time was there wasn't much you could read on the Web. Why, in those days, you could become famous by throwing up (in more than one sense) a quickly designed Web site conceived as a way to procrastinate based in part on something you once read in a magazine ... and get famous for it! Because, you see there wasn't much else to read at the time.

But pretty soon, they started putting useful (or at least interesting) information on the Web, and things were good, for a time. But they didn't stop there — no, they kept putting more information on the Web. And more and more! Why, some of it was even trivial!

An an example, take blogs. Time was, no one had a blog. Not even the President! Then a few of my buddies got them, and I would sporadically remember to read them when they sporadically remembered to write something. And it was all pretty good. Then more and more buddies, and even some pals, started sporadically writing in blogs, and I'd forget to read them for weeks or months after they'd posted something. But that made me cranky.

So I broke down and looked into this new-fangled RSS technology that everyone had been talking about. After a while, I settled on Google Reader as a way to read all my friends' blogs' RSS feeds. And there was peace and calm once again.

But then they started slapping those durn RSS icons everywhere — you couldn't swing a cordless mouse without hitting someone's RSS feed! And, like a fool, I added 'em all to my feed reader. I had feeds from all my friends' blogs, their Flickr photos, local news sources, and even some humorous comic strips!

I had all sorts of information to read, but the thing was, I had less and less time in which to read it. Now, think about that!

But it wasn't just the RSS feeds. Everyone and his horse started microblogging on Twitter, yappin' away about their doings, transpirings, and whatnot. More information! And they posted more whatnot on their Facebook and the what-have-you. To say nothing of the actual news of the day one might be inclined to read about.

Well, it's gotten so a man can't take it no more! It's too much! Am I supposed to mark swaths of unread blog feeds as read in my feed reader? But what if there's a useful article somewhere in there? Or a comment discussion I want to contribute to? And how's a fellow supposed to comment in peace when you keep Twittering at him?

As such, I hereby ask all y'all to stop saying so much on the Internet. Just keep it to the essentials. Allow me to catch up, at least. Thanks.

6 comments so far

1 Nov 08 '07 7:00am:

posh pants replied:

"maybe, for yr sake, i should create a whole OTHER blog that is just a weekly summary of my regular blog. so you will just get one update a week. and, given the content of my daily blog, i can guarantee that the summary will be no more than one line along the lines of: "food blah blah alamo drafthouse blah blah laughing babies blah blah peppermint mocha.""


2 Nov 09 '07 2:23am:

Jarrett replied:

"What about tabs? I always have more tabs open, to pages that, for whatever reason(s), are/seem interesting, than I will ever get to. Once a week or so, I close my eyes and just speed-tap the red X that closes tabs a few (dozen) times just to bring it back under control. (I hate that sentence.) I figure if I haven't gotten to it by then, I don't deserve to, and anyway most of it is already wildly out of date (as is the fashion of stuff found on the Internets)."


3 Nov 09 '07 7:38am:

tODD replied:

"Actually, Jarrett, the way things so quickly go out of date was to be the topic of my next "things I hate about the Web" post, more or less. Wow, you're really ... on the curmudgeon tip!"


4 Nov 09 '07 8:10pm:

Sarah Hazel replied:

"Maybe it's like collecting the mail. If one ignores it long enough, the information becomes obsolete. Then descisions are made for you by default! "


5 Nov 09 '07 8:12pm:

Sarah Hazel replied:

"Sorry. I spelled decisions incorrectly. Should have waited a little longer to make that decision. "


6 Dec 05 '07 3:31pm:

Nils replied:

"My conscience is assuaged to know that Casa Jonsson has not been contributing to clutter in your RSS reader.

:-) :-("


Comment on this entry

(required)
(required, won't be displayed)

Save the above information for future comments
(must be correct to submit — prevents spam)

You must log in to comment with that data.

Allowed HTML: <a href="[URL]"> <b> <i> <s> <em> <li> <ol> <ul> <strong> <blockquote>

Previous entry: "Movable Type is the new Microsoft Word" Next entry: "That is not a survey"

Old blog entries by month

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000